Search

 

Thirty-nine percent of all children in foster care in the United States were placed with relatives/kin in 2024. This percentage is at an all-time high. While this progress is encouraging, the metric that is more important to consider is how many children are placed with kin in fully-supported licensed homes. With federal flexibility allowing for kin-specific foster care licensing as of late 2023, and over 20 jurisdictions approved to implement that flexibility in two short years, we are already seeing progress in supporting all children in foster care, regardless of whether they are placed with kin or non-kin.  

Introduction

About 127,449 children or 39 percent of all children in foster care in the United States were placed with relatives/kin in 2024. [1]This percentage is at an all-time high. While this progress is encouraging, the metric that is more important to consider is how many children are placed with kin in fully supported licensed homes.

 

In 2024, about 44 percent of these children - over 55,000 children - were in unlicensed/unapproved homes with relatives/kin. When children are in the legal custody of the child welfare system, and live in the care of unlicensed/unapproved kin, they are subject to all the rules and restrictions of the foster care system, but are not supported with foster care maintenance payments to help meet their needs. Because licensure is tied to FCMP, it is important to license these homes, and thanks to new federal flexibility, we are already seeing more children in relative/kin foster homes supported like other children in foster care.

 

Foster Care Licensing  

Federal requirements have largely left the licensing of foster parents to the title IV-E child welfare agencies. Federal law has long required that Title IV-E agencies create and maintain their own foster care licensing or approval standards. 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(10)(A). Jurisdictions vary dramatically in their standards, and their processes and procedures in licensing both non-relatives and relatives/kin.  

 

For decades, a federal regulation was interpreted as dictating that each Title IV-E agency can only have one set of foster care licensing or approval standards that apply equally to kin and non-kin. 45 CFR § 1355.20. However, the licensing of relatives/kin is by its nature different than the licensing of non-relatives.  One key difference is that it usually occurs in a different order. For relatives, because they are concerned about the placement of a specific child with them, they often seek licensure after placement. The way the foster care system was set-up and the way it typically works is that foster parents are licensed before any children are placed with them. This reverse order of events impacts the urgency of licensing for relatives.  

 

In September 2023, responding to the need to allow for separate standards for kin/relatives, the U.S. Administration for Children and Families (ACF) issued a final rule that explicitly gives all Title IV-E child welfare agencies the option to use kin-specific foster care licensing or approval standards and encourages them to limit those standards to federal safety requirements. This change is allowing more children to be cared for by those they know and love and be financially supported like children with non-kin foster parents. 
 
The rule is a significant move forward for thousands of children who are placed with kin in foster care and yet do not receive monthly financial assistance to meet their needs, because licensure is tied to monthly support. By allowing tailored licensing or approval standards for relatives and kin, the rule is promoting equity for all children in family foster homes and will prevent children from going into group or institutional placements when they can be placed with loving and supported kin instead. The rule has opened the door for supporting children with kin by encouraging agencies to implement kin-specific standards that do away with stringent requirements that lack a clear nexus to safety. 

 

What the Kin-Specific Licensing Means & Does Not Mean 

The 2023 rule does nothing to change state, territorial, and tribal flexibility in creating and maintaining their own foster care licensing or approval standards. 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(10)(A).  

 

Standards that bar many kin from becoming licensed or approved – such as not having enough rooms in their homes or misdemeanor criminal charges for writing bad checks – are not federal requirements. Title IV-E agencies have the power to implement standards that omit these nonsensible and socioeconomically biased standards, and ACF is encouraging that they do so.  

 

Despite misimpressions that persist, federal requirements under the new rule remain the same: safety-related, reasonable, and flexible. 

 

Specifically, the 2023 rule: 

  1. Encourages Title IV-E agencies to establish kin-specific licensing or approval standards that are limited to long-standing federal law that requires Title IV-E agencies to:  
    1. Conduct criminal and child abuse background checks under the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. Under that federal law, if these checks discover that a potential foster parent, whether kin or not, has been convicted of a violent felony (other than physical assault or battery) or a felony against children or a spouse, they are barred from ever being a foster parent. If the checks show that a potential foster parent has been convicted of felony battery or assault or a drug-related felony within the past five years, they are barred from being a foster parent for those five years. 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(20)
    2. Align their standards “reasonably in accord with recommended standards of national organizations…including standards related to admission policies, safety, sanitation, and protection of civil rights, and which shall permit use of the reasonable and prudent parenting standard.” 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(10)(A)
  2. Requires Title IV-E agencies to ensure that licensed or approved kin foster family homes receive the same foster care maintenance payments as non-kin foster homes. This does away with the practice in some states of providing less or no financial support to kin who are approved under a different set of standards than non-kin. 

 

Kin-Specific Approval Standards Available to Help Implement the Rule 

To help agencies implement this federal rule and ensure that the new kin-specific standards fulfill the long-standing requirement to align with nationally recommended standards, kin-specific approval standards have been developed by a coalition of national nonprofit organizations: A Second Chance, Inc., American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law, Children’s Rights, CWPolicy, Generations United and its Grandfamilies & Kinship Support Network: A National Technical Assistance Center, National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA), National Indian Child Welfare Association, New America’s Resource Family Working Group, and Think of Us.  

 

This work was done in close collaboration with kin caregivers, subject matter experts, and at least 45 Title IV-E child welfare agencies. Please see the Kin-Specific Foster Home Approval: Recommended Standards of National Organizations and related tools housed at grandfamilies.org 

 

The kin-specific standards were further informed by the NARA Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards, which were designed as part of a multi-year effort between the ABA Center on Children and the Law, Generations United, and the National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA), under the old requirement of only allowing one set of licensing standards for kin and non-kin. The research conducted as part of that effort is summarized in Improving Foster Care Licensing Standards around the United States:  Using Research Findings to Effect Change and was cited in the preamble to the 2023 proposed rule. Both the NARA Model – and the HHS National Model that “heavily relied” on the NARA Model - can and should still be consulted for non-kin standards, as it addresses many of the barriers that all potential foster families face.

Background for Promoting Kin Placement and Licensing

Definitions of Relative & Kin 

In a published response to comments on the 2023 proposed rule, ACF continues to give Title IV-E agencies the discretion to define relative and/or kin as they determine best. However, ACF goes on to “encourage agencies to define relative and kin in a way that is inclusive of tribal custom and adopt a broad definition of relative and kin for purposes of licensing and approval standards.” 
 
The partners creating the kin-specific foster care licensing standards use the term “kin” to be inclusive of all “individuals related to a child by blood, marriage, tribal custom and/or adoption and other individuals who have an emotionally significant relationship with the child or the child’s parents or other family members.”  

 

Children Thrive with Kin 
For many years, child welfare agencies largely overlooked relatives as resources for the foster care of children who had been abused or neglected. However, in the 1980s, as the need for foster care exceeded the supply of traditional foster families, child welfare agencies began to turn to relatives. Initially, relative foster care was seen primarily as an emergency response to provide care for children entering foster care. Over time, however, practitioners began to observe, and research confirmed, that as compared to children in non-relative foster care, children in the care of relatives experience: 

 

  1. Increased stability 
    1. Fewer placement changes  

    2. Better educational outcomes and educational stability 

    3. Less likely to re-enter the foster care system after returning to birth parents or exiting to guardianship 

  2. Strong permanency 

    1. Relatives are willing to adopt or become permanent guardians when reunification with parents is not possible. In fact, 33% of children adopted from foster care are adopted by relatives. 

  3. Better behavioral and mental health outcomes   

  4. More feelings of belonging and acceptance 

    1. Report they “always felt loved” 

    2. More likely to like who they live with (93% vs. 79% for non-relative foster care) 

    3. Less likely to try to run away 

    4. More likely to express preference for maintaining connections and placement with kin 

  5. Increased likelihood of living with or staying connected to siblings 

  6. Greater preservation of cultural identity and community connections and connections to their families [2]  

 
Placement 
In accordance with this research, federal law requires -- as a prerequisite for receiving funding for child welfare services -- that states “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a non-related caregiver when determining placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.” [3] This provision has been federal law since 1996, when it was enacted as part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Consequently, it is believed that all states currently mandate either through law or policy and practice that child welfare agencies give preference to fit and willing relative caregivers. 

 

Since states must consider giving preference to adult relatives to receive federal funding, it is presumptive that states would provide straightforward language in their statutes regarding the placement of children with relatives. However, a comprehensive state statutory review revealed that the language is often difficult to find, and the language differs widely. The continuum goes from relatives “must be considered,” to “shall promote” placement with relatives, to specifically providing an order of placement preference that lists relatives as first, and finally to very strong language such as “shall place” with relatives.  

 

Michigan has among the clearest language of the state statutes concerning relative placement: “Before determining placement of a child in its care, a supervising agency must give special consideration and preference to a child's relative or relatives who are willing to care for the child, are fit to do so, and would meet the child's developmental, emotional, and physical needs. The supervising agency's placement decision must be made in the child's best interests.”[4] In Indiana, “the department shall consider placing a child … with a relative related by blood, marriage, or adoption before considering any other placement of the child.”[5]  

 

While placement with relatives/kin is at an all-time high of 39 percent in 2024, the most important metric for measuring success as a kin-first agency is whether these children are in licensed/approved kin homes. Licensure is tied to financial support to help meet the needs of children in foster care. Without licensure, these kinship families are subject to all the rules and restrictions of the foster care system, but do not receive ongoing support as all non-kin foster parents receive nor do they have a pathway to exit foster care into a supported guardianship arrangement.

Trends

In two short years, over 20 states and tribes have been approved by ACF to implement kin-specific foster care licensing. With that progress, we expert to see an increase in supported placement rates and will monitor data as time goes on.

 

If you have any comments or suggestions on this content, please contact the author: Ana Beltran, Generations United, at abeltran@gu.org.


 

[1] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS). The AFCARS Dashboard

[2] Generations United, Children Thrive in Granfamilies.
https://www.gu.org/app/uploads/2023/05/23-Children-Thrive-in-Grandfamilies.pdf 

[3] 42 U.S.C. 671(a)(19).

[4] Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. section 722.954a.

[5] Ind. Code Ann. section 31-34-4-2.

Partner Organizations